I.
In the past, architecture represented
the culture and region instead of the
creator of the building.
VI.
Since subjective value does not
have absolute standard, everyone's
opinion should be treated equally.
II.
III.
Elite architects influenced the field
by defining goodness of architecture
through various media.
The trend changed and the light that
shined the building started to flash
the architect.
VII.
VIII.
New metrics as a survey will provide
clarity of evaluation by converting
values to numbers.
New metrics contain six different
categories to evaluate architecture
in various aspects.
IV.
Evaluation of architecture became
a top-down system that the winners
were selected by juries' opinions.
IX.
The platform as an open door will broaden a scale of evaluation from critique among the juries to public negotiation.
V.
Architecture has subjective values
which can be varied based on the
individual's perspective.
X.
Democratic negotiation will encourage public voice to be heard, and include everyone to shape the community together.
A New Movement for Evaluation of Architecture
From the Hegemony of Elitism to the Negotiation of Public Voice